For instance: A 1000 pound car hits a wall at 10 miles an hour. It has to negate that much momentum. Same small car hits a 3000 pound car head on, each going 10 mph. The small car will end up going the opposite direction at 5mph, while the big vehicle will still be going 5mph in its original direction. That means the small car underwent THREE TIMES the acceleration as the large vehicle (10 to -5 compared to 10 to 5.)
While the smart car is safe when hitting stationary objects, it is not terribly safe when being hit by other, larger vehicles. Id much prefer being in the tundra.|||All toyotas have engineered bodies that will take on about everything. It would smash a smart car. Toyota when hit head on the motor mounts break away dropping engine and top half of front comes up and hood latches to protect passengers. Hit at sides, 35 MPH impact will not go in car.
Report Abuse
|||NO NO NO!!!!
Check crash tests! You'd be safer in a smart than in a Ford Crown Vic!!
THAT YOUTUBE VIDEO TESTED BOTH CARS AT 70MPH!!!
BOTH CARS WERE TERRIBLY DESTROYED!!! YOUTUBE IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE OF PERSUASION!!!!
Report Abuse
|||well the smart is pretty safe for it's size but it does not really stand a chance against a Tundra..but then again there are just a few cars that can really protect the pasangers in case of a head on with a truck/suv|||No matter What safety rating a car gets it can't be safe, when it goes up against something three times its size. Tundra probably safer higher up.|||depends on speed the people in the tundra would be safer only because it is 3 times the size|||Everyone in the smart car would die.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju6t-yyoU鈥?/a>
The car would be mostly okay, but not the people inside.|||The people in the smart car would all die.. its a given..
No comments:
Post a Comment