It's better if it has GPS capabilities and runs on Windows Mobile Operating System
What do you think about the HP ipaq 6900 series smart phone?|||The best is such a personal decision. It really depends on your requirements. Since you require GPS and WinMobile you've narrowed down the field considerably. If you have a particular carrier you want to use (or already use) that may narrow down the field even more.
What I did to make my final decision was to read the specifications of the phones available after using my criteria (to narrow the field) and also did web searches of the reviews for that model.
Based on all that (carrier, call quality, PIM features, price), I selected the Nokia E62. There are some features that it's European sibling has that this one doesn't (WiFi, 3G) and I would have like to have those, but they weren't necessary. Do your preshopping home work and you won't regret you decision.
Here are some links to get you started...
PS - It took me a month to make my final decision.
http://www.mobiletechreview.com/
http://www.informationweek.com/story/sho鈥?/a>
http://reviews.search.com/search?q=Smart鈥?/a>
http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/鈥?/a>
http://www.pocketpcmag.com/_archives/mob鈥?/a>
http://www.itweek.co.uk/personal-compute鈥?/a>
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,115鈥?/a>|||palm treo 700w|||I suggest a blackberry.|||TREO 700P (Palm OS) or TREO700W (Windows OS). Similar capabilities, but the 700P has a higher density screen display.|||went from blackberry to ppc 6700 should fit the bill
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
What is more convenient a smart card or 7 day short trip pass to go to DC?
I wll start commuting from Greenbelt Md to Washington DC five times a week. What is the best way to make this commute the least expensive? A 7 day short trip pass or by using a smart card? Thank you for your answers.|||A short trip pass will not get you from Greenbelt to downtown - it is capped at $2.65 per trip. You'll have to figure out for yourself (depending on your destination downtown) whether it is cheaper to get a 7 day unlimited use pass or not.
If you are driving you will at least need a SmartTrip card to pay for parking.
A lot of employers in D.C. offer transit benefits. I would find out if yours is one of them. Commuting costs can really add up!|||Smart Trip card is more convenient. You can take it any where and if you look into it it shows you that you get a better discount if you use smarttrip. But you should really put in your exact location and exact destination on wmata.com go to the trip planner. It should show you the difference between paying cash and what you save with a smart trip card. The website will also give you a little more info/cost on that 7day pass as well. Hope this helped you!
If you are driving you will at least need a SmartTrip card to pay for parking.
A lot of employers in D.C. offer transit benefits. I would find out if yours is one of them. Commuting costs can really add up!|||Smart Trip card is more convenient. You can take it any where and if you look into it it shows you that you get a better discount if you use smarttrip. But you should really put in your exact location and exact destination on wmata.com go to the trip planner. It should show you the difference between paying cash and what you save with a smart trip card. The website will also give you a little more info/cost on that 7day pass as well. Hope this helped you!
How do I transfer iTunes smart playlists from one PC to another?
I'm transfering my mp3 library to a new computer and don't want to have to recreate my over 75 smart playlists|||I'm pretty sure that all the iTunes playlists info is saved in C:\Documents and Settings\YOURUSERNAME\My Documents\My Music\iTunes
You can simply copy the folder "iTunes", to the same directory on the other PC with iTunes installed on it. That is how I restored all my music libraries after I re-installed my Windows.
You can simply copy the folder "iTunes", to the same directory on the other PC with iTunes installed on it. That is how I restored all my music libraries after I re-installed my Windows.
What would happen if a Smart car and a Tundra were to crash?
It's a real random question that I was wondering. Some say the smart car is safe, others say it's not. Which of the drivers would be the safest and which car would be more damaged? What car is safer?|||One of the most important things to realize is that during crash testing, they crash the vehicles into stationary objects. That means they only have to dissipate THEIR energy. When it comes to a real world crash, the heavier car has alot more energy and momentum which it transfers to the smaller car.
For instance: A 1000 pound car hits a wall at 10 miles an hour. It has to negate that much momentum. Same small car hits a 3000 pound car head on, each going 10 mph. The small car will end up going the opposite direction at 5mph, while the big vehicle will still be going 5mph in its original direction. That means the small car underwent THREE TIMES the acceleration as the large vehicle (10 to -5 compared to 10 to 5.)
While the smart car is safe when hitting stationary objects, it is not terribly safe when being hit by other, larger vehicles. Id much prefer being in the tundra.|||All toyotas have engineered bodies that will take on about everything. It would smash a smart car. Toyota when hit head on the motor mounts break away dropping engine and top half of front comes up and hood latches to protect passengers. Hit at sides, 35 MPH impact will not go in car.
|||NO NO NO!!!!
Check crash tests! You'd be safer in a smart than in a Ford Crown Vic!!
THAT YOUTUBE VIDEO TESTED BOTH CARS AT 70MPH!!!
BOTH CARS WERE TERRIBLY DESTROYED!!! YOUTUBE IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE OF PERSUASION!!!!
|||well the smart is pretty safe for it's size but it does not really stand a chance against a Tundra..but then again there are just a few cars that can really protect the pasangers in case of a head on with a truck/suv|||No matter What safety rating a car gets it can't be safe, when it goes up against something three times its size. Tundra probably safer higher up.|||depends on speed the people in the tundra would be safer only because it is 3 times the size|||Everyone in the smart car would die.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju6t-yyoU鈥?/a>
The car would be mostly okay, but not the people inside.|||The people in the smart car would all die.. its a given..
For instance: A 1000 pound car hits a wall at 10 miles an hour. It has to negate that much momentum. Same small car hits a 3000 pound car head on, each going 10 mph. The small car will end up going the opposite direction at 5mph, while the big vehicle will still be going 5mph in its original direction. That means the small car underwent THREE TIMES the acceleration as the large vehicle (10 to -5 compared to 10 to 5.)
While the smart car is safe when hitting stationary objects, it is not terribly safe when being hit by other, larger vehicles. Id much prefer being in the tundra.|||All toyotas have engineered bodies that will take on about everything. It would smash a smart car. Toyota when hit head on the motor mounts break away dropping engine and top half of front comes up and hood latches to protect passengers. Hit at sides, 35 MPH impact will not go in car.
Report Abuse
|||NO NO NO!!!!
Check crash tests! You'd be safer in a smart than in a Ford Crown Vic!!
THAT YOUTUBE VIDEO TESTED BOTH CARS AT 70MPH!!!
BOTH CARS WERE TERRIBLY DESTROYED!!! YOUTUBE IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE OF PERSUASION!!!!
Report Abuse
|||well the smart is pretty safe for it's size but it does not really stand a chance against a Tundra..but then again there are just a few cars that can really protect the pasangers in case of a head on with a truck/suv|||No matter What safety rating a car gets it can't be safe, when it goes up against something three times its size. Tundra probably safer higher up.|||depends on speed the people in the tundra would be safer only because it is 3 times the size|||Everyone in the smart car would die.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju6t-yyoU鈥?/a>
The car would be mostly okay, but not the people inside.|||The people in the smart car would all die.. its a given..
Is it smart to pay more money than my car payment to pay it off early?
I owe around $12,000 on my Ford Escape. 50k miles. I have 39 remaining payments of 375.00. Is it smart to pay more than my car payment or even pay double payments each month to try and pay it off early or is that not smart?|||Paying off a loan early is almost always the smart move. You will save money in interest. The earlier in the loan you are, the more interest you will save.
This is true of any loan, including mortgages and credit cards.|||Do you have a saving account?
Does it have 6 months of income in it?
If you answered no to either of these questions, then you need to build you saving first.
If you lose your job today with no savings but the car is paid off you are screwed as you have no access to cash and no income.
If you loss you job with money in the bank, even with a car payment you can get by for a while.
See my point?|||If the interest rate is high it is a good idea, and even may be a good idea if it is not so high. The possible exception would be if you have balances on credit cards; pay those off first if the interest on those is higher than on the car loan.|||Yes, it is smart to pay more and/or pay off debt early.|||well paying installment before due date .they will give certain amount discount
This is true of any loan, including mortgages and credit cards.|||Do you have a saving account?
Does it have 6 months of income in it?
If you answered no to either of these questions, then you need to build you saving first.
If you lose your job today with no savings but the car is paid off you are screwed as you have no access to cash and no income.
If you loss you job with money in the bank, even with a car payment you can get by for a while.
See my point?|||If the interest rate is high it is a good idea, and even may be a good idea if it is not so high. The possible exception would be if you have balances on credit cards; pay those off first if the interest on those is higher than on the car loan.|||Yes, it is smart to pay more and/or pay off debt early.|||well paying installment before due date .they will give certain amount discount
How do I use the Smart Defender player weapon in Madden 09?
How do I use the Smart Defender or "Light Bulb" player weapon? I know that I sould be able to see some of the other players play but I dont know how to use it. How does it work?|||You can't use it. How it works is, if it's the QB that's smart then if the defense runs the same plays over and over, then the light bulb with fill up with each recognized play. If it's a defender with the bulb then the more frequently the QB calls the same plays, their bulb will fill up. Now, seeing plays run consecutively on either side fills up the light bulb more rapidly.
Why are Holland the only smart nation to legalize and sell Marijuana?
They are smart people. Marijuana should be legal everywhere to those above age. It would give people an alternative to exploding their liver and kidneys from alcohol all the time :) And it would be great for tax, crime would lower and physical violence in crime and relationships (domestic abuse etc)|||Holland is the not the only nation that has legalized marijuana. Many nations are now reviewing they're ineffective and outdated marijuana policy's put in place by pressure of foreign governments before marijuana use was widespread.(Guess who did the most pressuring for other countries to ban it? The USA) Conventions such as the Single convention(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Conv鈥?/a> led most nations to ban marijuana before it was fully studied and a common drug. Since the single convention many nations have broken away from what they agreed to and started reducing the penalties for marijuana. Almost all modern nations have decriminalized marijuana and deal with it by means of a civil citation or fine. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of鈥?/a>
Marijuana was made illegal in the united states during the Mexican revolution. In the early 1900s, the western states developed significant tensions regarding the influx of Mexican-Americans. Refugees from the revolution in Mexico in 1910 spilled over the border and later in that decade, bad feelings developed between the small farmer and the large farms that used cheaper Mexican labor. Then, the depression came and increased tensions, as jobs and welfare resources became scarce.
One of the "differences" seized upon during this time was the fact that many Mexicans smoked marijuana and had brought the plant with them. However, the first state law outlawing marijuana did so not because of Mexicans using the drug. Oddly enough, it was because of Mormons using it. Mormons who traveled to Mexico in 1910 came back to Salt Lake City with marijuana. The church was not pleased and ruled against use of the drug. Since the state of Utah automatically enshrined church doctrine into law, the first state marijuana prohibition was established in 1915. (Today, Senator Orrin Hatch serves as the prohibition arm of this heavily church-influenced state.) Other states quickly followed suit with marijuana prohibition laws, including Wyoming (1915), Texas (1919), Iowa (1923), Nevada (1923), Oregon (1923), Washington (1923), Arkansas (1923), and Nebraska (1927). These laws tended to be specifically targeted against the Mexican-American population. Keep in mind during this time period the leaders and representatives of this country were ALL Caucasian and didn't hide the fact that they were severely racist. Any legislation targeting a minority group had a high chance to pass. If you go to the library of congress and read some of the things that were said you would be in disbelief, one such quote was "All Mexicans are crazy and this stuff is what makes them crazy" (referring to marijuana). Drug law after drug law past and the U.S. pressured many foreign countries into prohibiting the drug also as previously stated. President Nixon commissioned a group called the schafer commission to extensively study the illegality of the substance and to report their findings. It is rumored based on the statement of a secret service member inside the oval office at the time(although not verified) that President Nixon read the report and threw it away after reading the first page of the report that recommended legalizing marijuana. A copy of the report can be found online.
On a better note many states/countries are now realizing the marijuana laws are ineffective and decriminalizing it. Massachusetts is expected to join a dozen other states with decriminalization via voter referendum on November fourth. And many modern countries have started the decriminalization process including Canada, Mexico, Australia, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Turkey and Portugal.|||Who cares go move to Holland if you want legal weed|||Yes and all the people who are totally over getting loaded can distribute it and take all their jobs and get filthy rich! f*ck yeah!
i been there.. its fun, but i think it's still a grey zone and not legal. for instance, you can only carry up to a certain amount on you. it was 5g till a while ago, I don't know how the laws have changed.|||It's true man...I mean it would probably get a little more expensive then your average 10 a gram, but think about how many new jobs would be created! Someone to cultivate the weed, someone to pick the buds...hell maybe even someone to individually roll joints and put em in cigarette like packs...Pot could deffinatley be America's Number one Export!|||didn't this country learn anything from when they made alcohol illegal, it doesn't work
all there doing by making marijuana illegal is making people want it more and do anything to get it, plus the drug dealers make a **** load of money.
alcohol is terrible for you and they eventually made it legal, give it time things will change.
maybe for your child's 18th[or 21st] birthday you'll be buying them a joint instead of a nasty beer
Marijuana was made illegal in the united states during the Mexican revolution. In the early 1900s, the western states developed significant tensions regarding the influx of Mexican-Americans. Refugees from the revolution in Mexico in 1910 spilled over the border and later in that decade, bad feelings developed between the small farmer and the large farms that used cheaper Mexican labor. Then, the depression came and increased tensions, as jobs and welfare resources became scarce.
One of the "differences" seized upon during this time was the fact that many Mexicans smoked marijuana and had brought the plant with them. However, the first state law outlawing marijuana did so not because of Mexicans using the drug. Oddly enough, it was because of Mormons using it. Mormons who traveled to Mexico in 1910 came back to Salt Lake City with marijuana. The church was not pleased and ruled against use of the drug. Since the state of Utah automatically enshrined church doctrine into law, the first state marijuana prohibition was established in 1915. (Today, Senator Orrin Hatch serves as the prohibition arm of this heavily church-influenced state.) Other states quickly followed suit with marijuana prohibition laws, including Wyoming (1915), Texas (1919), Iowa (1923), Nevada (1923), Oregon (1923), Washington (1923), Arkansas (1923), and Nebraska (1927). These laws tended to be specifically targeted against the Mexican-American population. Keep in mind during this time period the leaders and representatives of this country were ALL Caucasian and didn't hide the fact that they were severely racist. Any legislation targeting a minority group had a high chance to pass. If you go to the library of congress and read some of the things that were said you would be in disbelief, one such quote was "All Mexicans are crazy and this stuff is what makes them crazy" (referring to marijuana). Drug law after drug law past and the U.S. pressured many foreign countries into prohibiting the drug also as previously stated. President Nixon commissioned a group called the schafer commission to extensively study the illegality of the substance and to report their findings. It is rumored based on the statement of a secret service member inside the oval office at the time(although not verified) that President Nixon read the report and threw it away after reading the first page of the report that recommended legalizing marijuana. A copy of the report can be found online.
On a better note many states/countries are now realizing the marijuana laws are ineffective and decriminalizing it. Massachusetts is expected to join a dozen other states with decriminalization via voter referendum on November fourth. And many modern countries have started the decriminalization process including Canada, Mexico, Australia, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Turkey and Portugal.|||Who cares go move to Holland if you want legal weed|||Yes and all the people who are totally over getting loaded can distribute it and take all their jobs and get filthy rich! f*ck yeah!
i been there.. its fun, but i think it's still a grey zone and not legal. for instance, you can only carry up to a certain amount on you. it was 5g till a while ago, I don't know how the laws have changed.|||It's true man...I mean it would probably get a little more expensive then your average 10 a gram, but think about how many new jobs would be created! Someone to cultivate the weed, someone to pick the buds...hell maybe even someone to individually roll joints and put em in cigarette like packs...Pot could deffinatley be America's Number one Export!|||didn't this country learn anything from when they made alcohol illegal, it doesn't work
all there doing by making marijuana illegal is making people want it more and do anything to get it, plus the drug dealers make a **** load of money.
alcohol is terrible for you and they eventually made it legal, give it time things will change.
maybe for your child's 18th[or 21st] birthday you'll be buying them a joint instead of a nasty beer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)